final draft

December 9, 2012

Dear American Citizens:

Gender discrimination remains in our culture because of the pervasive influence of advertising in the media. Advertising makes people believe there is only one right way a male and a female should act or look, which has caused many people to question their  acceptance in society. The media promotes a powerful influence of gender roles which are broadcasted through sexual, violent, and dehumanizing advertisements. The pressures created onto people by the media describe an unrealistic reality from which men and women try to understand and emulate. The objectification of women in advertisements is dehumanizing and the glorification of violence has increased sexual, physical, and verbal assault in our country. Equality in our nation has been the ultimate goal since the first settlers arrived on this land. However, there still are gender inequalities due to the evolutionary idea “survival of the fittest”. Behaviors exhibited by the strong and powerful (men in our society) are justified through this concept, conditioning them to ride over the weak. The media has evoked this very idea which has stretched the inequalities of male and female gender roles further apart.  

Since the day we are born, gender roles are being taught to us. In a typical American family, a parent would present either a red fire truck to their son or a pink barbie doll to their daughter. Blakie, author of "Gender Roles and Degrading Women in America", says children should not be forced into gender roles. She suggests giving a child an equal balance of toys to choose from will make it so they are not forced to conform to modern gender roles. I was raised by parents who allowed me to choose what things I wanted to play with. I always ended up choosing the more masculine item, not only because I wouldn’t want my friends to make fun of me for playing with a doll, but because I was more interested in the masculine toy. My parents also never guided me to act or behave by societies pretense of masculinity, but allowed me to discover my own gender role. However, when I reached the age when I was subjected to outside influences other than my parents, I took on society’s projection of masculinity. From brothers, friends, coaches, and the media I was taught the “right way” to behave. 

Masculinity is a characteristic played out by males in our culture in order to seek acceptance. In the essay, “Bros before Hos”: The Guy Code, the author Michael Kimmel defines society’s expectations of masculinity in males ages 16 to 26. He searched throughout our nation, as well as 15 other countries, to hear men’s responses to the phrase, “be a man”.  What he discovered, he call’s, “Real Guy’s Top Ten List”, which summarized the top ten things guys said. For example; #1. “Boys don’t cry”, #2. “It’s better to be mad than sad”, #3. “Don’t get mad-get even”(609). The underlying message from all of the responses he received was it is not manly to show emotion or admit vulnerability. To be accepted as a “real guy”, Kimmel argues, “The face you must show to the world insists that everything is going just fine, that everything is under control, that there’s nothing to be concerned about”(609). These traits that make up “The Guy Code” act as a set of rules from which males live their lives according to.  This formulated structure of behavior most males in our society follow is the result of other men in their lives telling them how to act, says kimmel.

Kimmel suggests the reasons men follow this idea of masculinity is because they want to be positively evaluated by other men. By caring about other men’s approval, one can determine the right way to grow increasingly more liked on the social ladder.  If one breaks any of the “laws of masculinity” men will point out the weakness and the effect will be mostly verbal name calling. The names I hear people being called the most are gay and faggot.  These words are so commonly used in peoples everyday language that the actual definition of the words are rarely thought of. In an interview with Eminem, Eminem say’s, “The lowest degrading thing you can say to a man when you’re battling him is to call him a faggot and try to take away his manhood. Call him a sissy, call him a punk. ‘Faggot’ to me doesn’t necessarily mean gay people. ‘Faggot’ to me just means taking away your manhood”(612). However, taken out of this context and into reality, the meaning of those words attract a negative connotation, suggesting anyone that is gay is bad. Gay stereotypes are based on many different things, such as the way you dress, talk, walk, and what your interests are. The reasoning behind some of these characteristics are based on actual attributes of gay people, but most of the time when someone uses the word gay it is because something is different. 

The same reason some Americans fear a different culture, is the same reason some Americans fear gay people; difference. Fear is the byproduct of ignorance in people because we are programmed to fear difference. By pushing “gender roles”, marketers are promoting inequality and stereotypical gender roles, thus enhancing the idea that only one gender role is acceptable. Also, when trying to designate a specific gender role, the marketers use models who look according to society’s projected cultural appearance. Aldous Huxley said, “individuals have had to de-individualize themselves, have had to deny their native diversity and conform to a standard pattern, have had to do their best to become automata”(Brave New World Revisited). The models used in advertising are so heavily computer edited it is impossible for women to achieve what they see, yet they endlessly attempt to do so.  Former Supermodel Cindy Crawford said, "Even I don't wake up looking like Cindy Crawford". Advertisements are not promoting peoples Individual uniqueness, but are promoting the marketers  interpretation of normal. Aldous Huxley said, “They are normal not in what may be called the absolute sense of the word, but normal to an abnormal society”(Brave New World Revisited). Cultural norms are always evolving, and because of the large affect the media has on people, our culture is evolving at the marketers pace. We have become so accustomed to this mode of attack, the constant exposure to advertising does not leave us with the mindset to question the attack and develop on our own. 

Exploiting women's bodies is a very effective way of selling a product. However, this comes at the cost to every women’s safety. In the essay, “Two Ways a Women Can Get Hurt: Advertising and Violence” by Jean Kilbourne explains how sexual and violent advertising in the media are affecting women and mens attitudes, which leads to sexual aggression.  Kilbourne argues the way ads portray bodies of women as objects conditions us to see each other in dehumanizing ways, thus normalizing and glorifying rape and violence. Men are encouraged to be forceful and dominant because of how the advertisements show people having fun and enjoying what seems to be dark and evil behavior. For example, “don’t be such a good boy”, say’s an ad with two beautiful women looking adoringly at a man, but he isn’t looking at either one of them. Men who act dangerous and dark are considered sexy and desirable, if you believe this advertisement. However, popular culture believes this is the way men should really act.  Our society does not condone this behavior and it’s a manifestation of marketing. 

In the culture we live in, women are thought of as weak and powerless. Men are considered strong and powerful. In a Diet Coke ad “the women are physically, separated from the man. He is the one in control. His body is powerful, not passive”(587). Strength and powerfulness are gender stereotypes which are ways to oppress and discriminate one gender role from the other. It is human nature for men to play out these roles, but not so much to make women feel like they are nothing. In a Calvin Klein advertisement, they use a model who looked abused, vulnerable, and exploited. She is lying naked on a sofa, “pliant, available, androgynous enough to appeal to all kinds of pedophiles”(593). This kind of advertising degrades women.

Gender roles vary, but in our society only one role fits a specific gender. The negative effects of advertising is felt largely on younger people. Kids have a more difficult time telling right from wrong and if they see someone acting in a certain way, they are likely to copy that behavior. Growing up and going to school is challenging for any kid not “normal”. He or she is likely to be harassed and tormented and struggle to become accepted. Marketers use beautiful models to sell their products and promote an image.  Ignoring individual differences, they try to make their customers all want what they sell.  These items ignore that we are all different in size, shape, color, gender, weight, uniqueness  and mold customers to their product line. Many people in our culture have been tricked into believing there is only one acceptable way a female or male should look or act. Subjected by the media, people feel hopeless and insignificant.     

Sincerely, 

Sam Imsland

Bibliography 

Blakie. "Gender Roles and Degrading Women in America." Yahoo! Contributor Network. N.p., 15 Nov. 2012. Web. 18 Nov. 2012. http://voices.yahoo.com/gender-roles-degrading-women-america-10930.html. 

Huxley, Aldous, and Aldous Huxley. Brave New World: And, Brave New World Revisited. New York: HarperCollins, 2004. Print.

Kimmel, Michael. “Bros Before Hos”:The Guy Code. Rereading America: Eighth Edition. Text. 18 Nov. 2012.

Kilbourne, Jean. Media Selection. “Two Ways a Woman Can Get Hurt: Advertising and Violence”.Rereading America: Eighth Edition. Text. 18 Nov. 2012.

Revised draft

November 25, 2012

Dear American Citizens:

Gender discrimination remains in our culture because of the pervasive influence of advertising in the media. The media promotes a powerful influence of gender roles which are broadcasted through sexual, violent, and dehumanizing advertisements. The pressures created onto people by the media describe an unrealistic reality from which men and women try to understand and emulate. The objectification of women in advertisements is dehumanizing and the glorification of violence has increased sexual, physical, verbal assault in our country. Equality in our nation has been the ultimate goal since the first settlers arrived on this land. However, there still are gender inequalities due to the evolutionary idea “survival of the fittest”. Behaviors exhibited by the strong and powerful (men in our society) are justified through this concept, conditioning them to ride over the weak. The media has evoked this very idea which has stretched the inequalities of male and female gender roles further apart.  

Since the day we are born, gender roles are being taught to us. In a typical American family, a parent would present either a red fire truck to their son or a pink barbie doll to their daughter. Blakie, author of "Gender Roles and Degrading Women in America", says children should not be enforced so much of gender roles. She suggests giving a child an equal balance of choices of toys will make it so they do not have to conform to modern gender roles. I was raised by parents who allowed me to choose what things I wanted to play with. I always ended up choosing the more masculine item, not only because I wouldn’t want my friends to make fun of me for playing with a doll, but because I was more interested in the masculine toy. My parents also never guided me to act or behave by societies pretense of masculinity, but allowed me to discover my own gender role. However, when I reached the age when I was subjected to outside influences other than my parents, I took on society’s projection of masculinity. From brothers, friends, coaches, and the media I was taught the “right way” to behave. 

Masculinity is a characteristic played out by males in our culture in order to seek acceptance. In the essay, “Bros before Hos”: The Guy Code, the author Michael Kimmel defines society’s expectations of masculinity in males ages 16 to 26. He searched throughout our nation, as well as 15 other countries, to hear men’s responses to the phrase, “be a man”.  What he discovered, he call’s, “Real Guy’s Top Ten List”, which summarized the top ten things guys said. For example; #1. “Boys don’t cry”, #2. “It’s better to be mad than sad”, #3. “Don’t get mad-get even”(609). The underlying message from all of the responses he received was it is not manly to show emotion or admit vulnerability. To be accepted as a “real guy”, Kimmel argues, “The face you must show to the world insists that everything is going just fine, that everything is under control, that there’s nothing to be concerned about”(609). These traits that make up “The Guy Code” act as a set of rules from which males live their lives according to.  This formulated structure of behavior most males in our society follow is the result of other men in their lives telling them how to act, says kimmel.

Kimmel suggests the reasons men follow this idea of masculinity is because they want to be positively evaluated by other men. By caring about other men’s approval, one can determine the right way to grow increasingly more liked on the social ladder.  If one breaks any of the “laws of masculinity” men will point out the weakness and the effect will be mostly verbal name calling. The names I hear people being called the most are gay and faggot.  These words are so commonly used in peoples everyday language that the actual definition of the words are rarely thought of. In an interview with Eminem, Eminem say’s, “The lowest degrading thing you can say to a man when you’re battling him is to call him a faggot and try to take away his manhood. Call him a sissy, call him a punk. “Faggot” to me doesn’t necessarily mean gay people. “Faggot” to me just means taking away your manhood”(612). However, taken out of this context and into reality, the meaning of those words attract a negative connotation, suggesting anyone that is gay is bad. Gay stereotypes are based off many different things, such as the way you dress, talk, walk, and what your interests are. The reasoning behind some of these characteristics are based off of actual attributes of gay people, but most of the time when someone uses the word gay it is because something is different. 

The same reason some Americans fear a different culture, is the same reason some Americans fear gay people; difference. Fear is the byproduct of ignorance in people because we are programmed to fear difference. By pushing “gender roles”, marketers are promoting inequality and stereotypical gender roles, thus enhancing the idea that only one gender role is acceptable. Also, when trying to designate a specific gender role, the marketers use models who look accordingly to society’s projected cultural appearance. Aldous Huxley said, “individuals have had to de-individualize themselves, have had to deny their native diversity and conform to a standard pattern, have had to do their best to become automata”(Brave New World Revisited). The models used in advertising are so heavily computer edited it is impossible for women to achieve what they see, yet they endlessly attempt to do so.  Former Supermodel Cindy Crawford said, "Even I don't wake up looking like Cindy Crawford". Advertisements are not promoting peoples Individual uniqueness, but are promoting society’s interpretation of normal. Aldous Huxley said, “They are normal not in what may be called the absolute sense of the word, but normal to an abnormal society”(Brave New World Revisited). Cultural norms are always evolving, and because of the large affect the media has on people, our culture is evolving at an unnatural pace. We have become so well adjusted to this new mode of existence, the constant exposure to advertising does not leave us with the mindset to develop questions, says Aldous Huxley. 

Exploiting women's bodies is a very effective way of selling a product. However, this comes at the cost to every women’s safety. In the essay, “Two Ways a Women Can Get Hurt: Advertising and Violence” by Jean Kilbourne explains how sexual and violent advertising in the media are affecting women and mens attitudes, which leads to sexual aggression.  Kilbourne argues the way ads portray bodies of women as objects conditions us to see each other in dehumanizing ways, thus normalizing and glorifying rape and violence. Men are encouraged to be forceful and dominant because of how the advertisements show people having fun and enjoying what seems to be dark and evil behavior. For example, “don’t be such a good boy”, say’s an ad with two beautiful women looking adoringly at a man, but he isn’t looking at either one of them. Opposite from reality, men who are dangerous are considered sexy and desirable, however popular culture leads people to believe this is the way men should really act.  

In the culture we live in, women are thought of as weak and powerless; men are considered strong and powerful. In a Diet Coke ad “the women are physically, separated from the man. He is the one in control. His body is powerful, not passive”(587). Strength and powerfulness are gender stereotypes which are ways to oppress and discriminate one gender role from the other. It is human nature for men to play out these roles, but not so much to make women feel like they are nothing. In a Calvin Klein advertisement, they use a model who looked abused, vulnerable, and exploited. She is lying naked on a sofa, “pliant, available, androgynous enough to appeal to all kinds of pedophiles”(593). This kind of advertising degrades women.

Gender roles vary, but in our society only one role fits a specific gender. The negative affects of advertising is felt largely on younger people. Kids have a more difficult time telling right from wrong and if they see someone acting in a certain way, they are likely to copy that behavior. Growing up and going to school is challenging for any kid not “normal”. He or she is likely to be harassed and tormented and struggle to become accepted. Advertising makes people believe there is only one right way a male and a female should act or look, which has caused many people unable to find acceptance. 

Sincerely, 

Sam Imsland

rough draft

November 25, 2012

Dear American Citizens:

One of the main reasons for the continuance of gender discrimination in our culture is because of advertising in the media. The media has a powerful influence on socially desired gender roles in our country which is broadcasted through sexual, violent, and dehumanizing advertisements. The pressures created onto our citizens by the media describe an unrealistic reality from which men and women try to understand and emulate. The objectification of women in ads dehumanizes them and the encouragement of violence for males in ads has increased sexual, physical, verbal assault in our country. Equality in our nation has been the ultimate goal since the first settlers arrived on this land. However, there still are gender inequalities due to the evolutionary idea “survival of the fittest”. Behaviors exhibited by the strong and powerful (men in our society) are justified through this concept, conditioning them to ride over the weak. The media has evoked this very idea which has stretched the inequalities of male and female gender roles further apart.  

Since the day we are born gender roles are being taught to us. In a typical American family, a parent would present either a red fire truck for their son or a pink barbie doll for their daughter. Blakie, author of "Gender Roles and Degrading Women in America", says children should not be enforced so much of gender roles. She suggests giving a child an equal balance of gender roles will make it so they do not have to conform to modern gender roles. I was raised by parents who allowed me to choose what things I wanted to play with. I always ended up choosing the more masculine item, not only because I wouldn’t want my friends to make fun of me for playing with a doll, but because I was more interested in the masculine toy. My parents also never guided me to act or behave by societies pretense of masculinity, but allowed me to discover my own gender role. However, when I reached the age when I was subjected to outside influences other than my parents, I took on society’s projection of masculinity. From brothers, friends, coaches, and the media I was taught the “right way” to behave. 

Masculinity is a characteristic played out by males in our culture in order to seek exception. In the essay, “Bros before Hos”: The Guy Code, the author Michael Kimmel defines society’s expectations of masculinity in males ages 16 to 26. He searched throughout our nation, as well as 15 other countries, to hear men’s responses to the phrase, “be a man”.  What he discovered, he call’s, “Real Guy’s Top Ten List”, which summarizes the top ten things guys say. For example; #1. “Boys don’t cry”, #2. “It’s better to be mad than sad”, #3. “Don’t get mad-get even”(609). The underlying message from all of the responses he received involves the condolence of showing emotion or admitting to weakness. To be accepted as a “real guy”, Kimmel argues, “The face you must show to the world insists that everything is going just find, that everything is under control, that there’s nothing to be concerned about”(609). These traits that make up “The Guy Code” act as a set of rules from which males live their lives according too.  This formulated structure of behavior most males in our society follow is the result of other men in their lives, telling them how to act, says kimmel.

Kimmel suggests the reasons men follow this idea of masculinity is because they want to be positively evaluated by other men. By caring about other men’s approval, one can determine the right way to grow increasingly more liked on the social ladder.  If one breaks any of the “laws of masculinity” men will point out the weakness and the effect will be mostly verbal name calling. The names I hear people being called the most are gay and faggot.  These words are so commonly used in peoples everyday language that the actual definition of the words are rarely thought of. From an interview with Eminem, Eminem say’s, “The lowest degrading thing you can say to a man when you’re battling him is to call him a faggot and try to take away his manhood. Call him a sissy, call him a punk. “Faggot” to me doesn’t necessarily mean gay people. “Faggot” to me just means taking away your manhood”(612). In this context I believe it’s okay to call the person you are battling those names because the whole point of those things is to call people names. However, taken out of context and into reality, the meaning of those words attract a negative connotation, suggesting anyone that is gay is bad. Gay stereotypes are based off many different things, such as the way you dress, talk, walk, and what your interests are. The reasoning behind some of these characteristics are based off of actual attributes of gay people, but most of the time when someone uses the word gay it is because something is different. 

For the same reason some Americans fear a specific culture, is the same reason some Americans fear gay people; difference. Fear is the byproduct of ignorance in these people because they are afraid of anything that is unique. The drawers of the advertisements make certain to leave out any indication of the opposite sexes gender role in order to fit society’s cultural norms. By greatly distinguishing society’s different genders roles, they are enhancing society’s idea of inequality within the male and female gender. Also, when trying to designate a specific gender role, the drawers use models who look accordingly to society’s projected cultural appearance. Aldous Huxley said, “individuals have had to de-individualize themselves, have had to deny their native diversity and conform to a standard pattern, have had to do their best to become automata”. The models used in advertising are so heavily computer edited it is impossible for women to achieve what is called “beautiful”, yet they endlessly attempt to do so.  Former Supermodel Cindy Crawford said, "Even I don't wake up looking like Cindy Crawford". Advertisements are not promoting peoples Individual uniqueness, but are promoting society’s interpretation of normal. Aldous Huxley said, “They are normal not in what may be called the absolute sense of the word, but normal to an abnormal society”. 

Exploiting women's bodies is a very effective way of selling a product. However, this comes at the cost of every women’s safety. In the essay “Two Ways a Women Can Get Hurt”: Advertising and Violence by Jean Kilbourne explains how sexual and violent advertising in the media are affecting women and mens attitudes, which leads to sexual aggression.  Kilbourne argues the way ads portray bodies of women as objects conditions us to see each other in dehumanizing ways, thus normalizing and glorifying rape and violence. Men are encouraged to be forceful and dominant because of how the ads show people having fun and enjoying what seems to be dark and evil behavior. For example, “don’t be such a good boy”, say’s an ad with two beautiful women looking adoringly at a man, but he isn’t looking at either one of them. Opposite from reality, men who are dangerous are considered sexy and desirable, however popular culture leads people to believe this is the way men should really act.  

In the culture we live in, women are thought of as weak and powerless; men are considered strong and powerful. In a Diet Coke ad “the women are physically, separated from the man. He is the one in control. His body is powerful, not passive”(587). Strength and powerfulness are gender stereotypes which are ways to oppress and discriminate one gender role from the other. It is human nature for men to play out these roles, but not so much to make women feel like they are nothing. In a Calvin Klein advertisement, they use a model who looked abused, vulnerable, and exploited. She is lying naked on a sofa, “plaint, available, androgynous enough to appeal to all kinds of pedophiles”(593). This kind of advertising degrades women and stretches the male and female roles further apart in our society. 

Gender roles vary, but in our society only one role fits a specific gender. The negative affects of advertising is felt largely on younger people. Kids have a more difficult time telling right from wrong and if they see someone acting in a certain way, they are likely to copy that behavior. Growing up and going to school is challenging for any kid not normal. He or she is likely to be harassed and tormented and struggle to become accepted. Advertising makes people believe there is only one acceptable way a male and a female should act or look, which has caused many people unable to find acceptance. 

Sincerely, 

Sam Imsland

annotated bib.

Kilbourne, Jean. Media Selection. “Two Ways a Woman Can Get Hurt: Advertising and Violence”.Rereading America: Eighth Edition. Text. 18 Nov. 2012.

In this essay, taken from her 1999 book "Can't Buy My Love: How Advertising Changes the Way We Think and Feel", the author Jean Kilbourne explains how sexual and violent advertising in the media are affecting women and men’s attitudes, which leads to sexual aggression. Kilbourne argues the way ads portray bodies of women as objects conditions us to see each other in dehumanizing ways, thus normalizing and glorifying rape and violence. Also, when compared to women, men are less likely to be sexually abused, but cultural attitudes make it difficult to take this seriously. As an example, “Many boys grow up feeling that they are unmanly if they are not always ‘ready for action,’ capable of and interested in sex with any women who is available” (595). Some men do not like the highest authority position in the relationship, but feel obligated to play that part. She does a good job of comparing and explaining how the male and female gender roles are influenced through advertising.

Blakie. "Gender Roles and Degrading Women in America." Yahoo! Contributor Network. N.p., 15 Nov. 2012. Web. 18 Nov. 2012. http://voices.yahoo.com/gender-roles-degrading-women-america-10930.html.

The author, Blakie explains how gender roles are taught to us since the second we are born. She says children should not be enforced so much of gender roles. She suggests giving a child an equal balance of gender roles will make it so they do not have to conform to the modern gender roles. She also explains the history of the inequalities women had to overcome in-order to receive equal rights as men. Women’s rights have come a long way in our nation, but she says there still are gender inequalities. As an example, "Though now women are able to earn college degrees, have careers, own property, vote, or even run for political positions themselves, there are still countless gender inequalities".

proposal

Proposal 

Title: Gender Roles Broadcasted through the Media

Author: Sam Imsland

Topic: Male and female pressures inflicted by advertising 

Exigence: To explain the impacts of sexual, violent, and dehumanizing advertisements in the media and the influence they have on peoples perception of the gender code. 

Intended Audience: The younger generation of men and women who pay attention to ads in the media. 

Purpose: To inform readers the power media has on influencing the socially desired gender roles. 

Claims: the objectification of women in ads dehumanizes them and the encouragement of violence for males in ads has increased sexual, physical, verbal assault in our country. 

Main evidence: 

To be accepted as a “real guy”, Kimmel argues, “The face you must show to the world insists that everything is going just find, that everything is under control, that there’s nothing to be concerned about”(609).

Eminem say’s, “The lowest degrading thing you can say to a man when you’re battling him is to call him a faggot and try to take away his manhood. Call him a sissy, call him a punk. “Faggot” to me doesn’t necessarily mean gay people. “Faggot” to me just means taking away your manhood”(612).

For example, “don’t be such a good boy”, say’s an ad with two beautiful women looking adoringly at a man, but he isn’t looking at either one of them. 

In a Diet Coke ad “the women are physically, separated from the man. He is the one in control. His body is powerful, not passive”(587). Strength and powerfulness are gender stereotypes which are ways to oppress and discriminate one or the other.

In an ad by Calvin Klein, they use a model who looked abused, vulnerable, and exploited. She is lying naked on a sofa, “plaint, available, androgynous enough to appeal to all kinds of pedophiles”(593). This kind of advertising degrades women and stretches the male and female roles further apart in our society. 

Also when compared to women, men are less likely to be sexually abused, but cultural attitudes make it difficult to take this seriously. “Many boys grow up feeling that they are unmanly if they are not always ‘ready for action,’ capable of and interested in sex with any women who is available”(595).

RA#3 kimmel

In the essay, “Bros before Hos”: The Guy Code, the author Michael Kimmel defines society’s expectations of masculinity in males ages 16 to 26. He searched throughout our nation, as well as 15 other countries, to hear men’s responses to the phrase, “be a man”.   What he discovered, he call’s, “Real Guy’s Top Ten List”, which summarizes the top ten things guys say. For example; #1. “Boys don’t cry”, #2. “It’s better to be mad than sad”, #3. “Don’t get mad-get even”(609). The underlying message from all of the responses he received involves the condolence of showing emotion or admitting to weakness. To be accepted as a “real guy”, Kimmel argues, “The face you must show to the world insists that everything is going just find, that everything is under control, that there’s nothing to be concerned about”(609). These traits that make up “The Guy Code” act as a set of rules from which males live their lives according too.  This formulated structure of behavior most males in our society follow is the result of other men in their lives, telling them how to act. Male role models or mentors such as, fathers, coaches, brothers, uncles-strike great significance in teaching the younger generation of males the “right way” to behave. Kimmel suggests the reasons men follow this idea of masculinity is because they want to be positively evaluated by other men. By caring about other men’s approval, one can determine the right way to grow increasingly more liked on the social ladder.  If one breaks any of the “laws of masculinity” men will point out the weakness and the effect will be mostly verbal name calling. The names I hear people being called the most are gay and faggot.  These words are so commonly used in peoples everyday language that the actual definition of the words are rarely thought of. In an interview with Eminem, Eminem say’s, “The lowest degrading thing you can say to a man when you’re battling him is to call him a faggot and try to take away his manhood. Call him a sissy, call him a punk. “Faggot” to me doesn’t necessarily mean gay people. “Faggot” to me just means taking away your manhood”(612). In this context I believe it’s okay to call the person you are battling those names because the whole point of those things is to call people names. Gay stereotypes are are based on many different things, such as the way you dress, talk, walk to what your interests are. Kimmel say’s, “Everything that is perceived as gay goes into what we might call the Negative Playbook of Guyland. Avoid everything in it and you’ll be all right”(613). All right from what? Who cares what people call you or what they think about you. Everyone is different and not everyone gets along with each other. When you grow up you don’t have to associate with people how make fun of you for who you are. Kimmel does a good job in explaining the reasons males are masculine and sums the essay up nicely with a statistical reason that males are 6 times more likely to be diagnosed with ADD and ADHD.   

RA#2 Joan Morgan

RA #2

Title: From Fly-Girls to Bitches and Hoes

Author: Joan Morgan

Date: 1995

Topic: The negative impacts rap music has on black men and women.

Exigence: To confront the pervasive sexism of lyrics in hip-hop music. 

Intended audience: Black men and women, people who listen to hip-hop music, feminists. 

Purpose: To understand the reasons black men write misguiding lyrics and to change the messages they send toward healing the pain in black communities. 

Claims:  If we use rap music as a tool to positively communicate with one another, through this process it will establish a strong black community. 

Main Evidence: The author understands the racial prejudices every black man and black woman goes through growing up. She talks about the constant struggles underprivileged black families go through; from single mothers to murder and drugs and alcohol. Morgan says, “ rap music is really the complex mask African Americans often wear both to hide and express the pain”(603). The violent and derogatory words used by rappers can explain why their is so much violence and the incapability to love one another. 

Pathos: The author uses a personal incident of a family friend who was murdered. She talks about how committed and passionate she is about changing the black community. 

Effect: By showing how committed and devoted she is about solving these issues, it will encourage others to follow her path. 

Ethos: She is credible because she is a well educated, black female musician and writer. She has first handedly witnessed the sexual and violent impacts hip-hop music has had on women and men. 

Effect: By having a black female author, the reader has an inside look of how someone who is at the top of the put down list reacts to it all. 

Logos: The author uses logos by stating facts about the causes of death of black men. As an example, “The leading cause of death among black men ages fifteen to twenty-four is homicide. The majority of them will die at the hands of other black me”(602). 

Effect: By incorporating factual evidence into her writing the reader will understand how severe the problem really is.  

My Response: I believe the author does a good job of explaining the severity of the lyrics used by rappers. She argues, simply condemning the use of of violent and sexual words does little to change the symptoms it creates in black communities. The rappers are looked up to by so many people so, if they say something, it will likely be repeated by those who listen. By being such powerful role models, I agree, “hip-hop can help us win”. By creating a safe place to talk about the issues in their lives, it will spread awareness, and have a positive influence on the black community. 

gender roles; kilbourne

         The essay “Two Ways a Women Can Get Hurt”: Advertising and Violence by Jean Kilbourne explains how sexual and violent advertising in the media are affecting women and mens attitudes, which leads to sexual aggression.  Kilbourne argues the way ads portray bodies of women as objects conditions us to see each other in dehumanizing ways, thus normalizing and glorifying rape and violence. Men are encouraged to be forceful and dominant because of how the ads show people having fun and enjoying what seems to be dark and evil behavior. For example, “don’t be such a good boy”, say’s an ad with two beautiful women looking adoringly at a man, but he isn’t looking at either one of them. Opposite from reality, men who are dangerous are considered sexy and desirable, however popular culture leads people to believe this is the way men should really act.  

In the culture we live in, women are thought of as weak and powerless; men are considered strong and powerful. In a Diet Coke ad “the women are physically, separated from the man. He is the one in control. His body is powerful, not passive”(587). Strength and powerfulness are just gender stereotypes which are ways to oppress and discriminate one or the other. If both men and women were thought of as equals, there would not be a constant reminder telling men to be more aggressive or be more dominating. It is human nature for men to play out these roles, but not so much to make women feel like they are nothing. In an ad by Calvin Klein, they use a model who looked abused, vulnerable, and exploited. She is lying naked on a sofa, “plaint, available, androgynous enough to appeal to all kinds of pedophiles”(593). This kind of advertising degrades women and stretches the male and female roles further apart in our society. 

Although not pressured by the media as forceful as women, men are subjected to act and behave a certain way. Also when compared to women, men are less likely to be sexually abused, but cultural attitudes make it difficult to take this seriously. “Many boys grow up feeling that they are unmanly if they are not always ‘ready for action,’ capable of and interested in sex with any women who is available”(595). Some men do not like the highest authority position in the relationship, but feel obligated to do so. Gender roles vary, but in our society only one role fits a specific gender. The negative affects of advertising is felt largely on younger people. Kids have a more difficult time telling right from wrong and if they see someone acting in a certain way, they are likely to copy that behavior. Growing up and going to school is challenging for any kid not normal. He or she is likely to be harassed and tormented and struggle to become accepted. Advertising makes people believe there is only one acceptable way a male and a female should act or look, which has caused many people unable to find acceptance. 

updated prop 30 final draft

Sam Imsland

English 2

Mrs. Knapp

14 October, 2012

Yes on Prop. 30: Save Our Future

California was once the highest ranked state in the country to receive an education. Our public schools offered a well rounded form of education; music and art classes, metal and wood shop, school field trips, on top of the best materials and teachers needed to prepare our students in the competitive job market. However, the state of California is in a deep budget deficit effecting the necessary funding needed to ensure the high quality of education our students once received. Together, kindergarden through 12th grade and higher education makes up half of California’s state budget. Gov. Jerry Brown has drawn up a proposal for a temporary increase in sales and income tax in-order to replenish funding for education. A vote in favor of Prop 30 will help get our education standards back on track and give our students the education they deserve. 

A recent poll showed that California voters would support Prop. 30 which would increase sales and income taxes to reduce budget cuts to public education. The sales tax would increase 1/4 cent per dollar for four years and the personal income tax for those who make more than $250,000 for seven years. “If it passes, the state will receive several billion dollars in additional revenue that will help prevent further cuts to education and other areas,” said Dominic Brewer, vice dean of research in partnerships and globalization at Rossier. If Prop. 30 passes, our state would receive about $6 billion in additional state revenue. If rejected, the state budget would be shortened by $6 billion. In the case of failure, state law calls for $4.8 billion in automatic "trigger cuts" to public schools, more than $1 billion in cuts to higher education budgets and $100 million in other reductions. On top of the trigger cuts, further cuts will still be needed if this measure does not pass.

Raising taxes has always been difficult for lawmakers, one reason the state is 35 billion in debt. Unable to create revenue, our state has solved its fiscal problems by spending less. As a result, students have less opportunities and teachers are losing their jobs. According to an article in the LA Times, critics against Prop. 30 say, “the states budget troubles stem from out-of-control spending, not a shortage of revenue”. They argue that by supporting Prop. 30, the generated tax funds will be spent on things unrelated to education. However, stated in the official title and summary of Proposition 30, new revenues would be deposited into a newly created state account called the Education Protection Account (EPA). Of the funds in the account, 89 percent would be provided to schools and 11 percent to community colleges. Schools and community colleges could use these funds for any educational purpose. The details of the proposition are very clear and you can be assured the money from Prop. 30 will go into our classrooms. 

Being a college student I have personally seen the effects a lack of funding has had on our educational system.  I have paid the higher tuition fees and have struggled to receive the classes I have asked for. According to Students for Quality Education (www.csusqe.org/chapters), Cabrillo, the community college I currently attend, student fees have increased by 85.5% in the last few years, from $26/unit in spring 2010 to $46/unit in fall 2012. In-order to keep it from becoming any worse, Prop. 30 must pass. However if Prop. 30 does not pass, Cabrillo will face an additional cut of 7.3% making it even harder for students to enroll and afford tuition costs. Not only students face the burden of reduced funding, but the teachers, staff, and administration face losing their jobs.  My older brothers were at the same college five years ago and they have noticed it has become much more difficult to get into classes. Also, my dad came to Cabrillo thirty years ago and he remembers it being easy to get the classes he signed up for as well as afford the tuition costs. 

The availability and opportunity to receive a higher education in California is declining. Our state is ranked 31st for people ages 25-34 with a college degree (Complete College America). The number of people becoming educated is less and less each year. The labor force will be in great need of skilled workers in the next ten years because of the high number of retirees. However, we will not have a big enough skilled workforce to fill those job positions. This will cause businesses to outsource their workers furthering the decline of California’s economy. The future of our state depends on the number of educated people we can produce. So with the future of our economy tied so closely to education, allowing students the opportunity to easily go to college is the ultimate goal. Bill Freeman says in the article, Prop 30 Invests in Education, Economy , that Prop. 30 “is the only measure that stops the cuts, avoids the steep tuition hikes, and invests in our schools and colleges starting this year so we can prepare the next generation for the jobs of the future”. A well funded education system is key for a strong economy in the future. 

As a result of the current budget deficit, programs such as art and music will see a major change or probable cut. Personally, music and art were my most meaningful and enjoyable classes. The ceramics class I took in high school made me excited to go to school everyday. It created an interest for me to come to school everyday and learn while other academic subjects failed to motivate me. Robert Daniels, supervisor for the Visual and Performing Arts Department of San Francisco Unified School District, United Administrators of San Francisco, AFSA Local  says, “Art allows them to find joy in learning. With access to arts, you have various avenues to make kids want to learn and to learn better. By eradicating art and music programs, districts are putting a roadblock in the way of the students whose passions and strengths are manifested through these outlets”. Hands on learning is becoming a lost method of training for my generation. What if our art and music classes turned into classes where the only thing you did was talk about art or talk about music? It would be like being taught how to surf on the beach and never going out into the water to ride a wave. Art and music programs are not cheap to run, but are worth every penny because of the positive influence they can have on our lives.  

The education we provide for our students determines how successful our state will be. A vote Yes on proposition 30 will ensure a high quality of education and will make receiving a higher form of education more accessible. As a result of the current budget cuts to our schools, the education our future generations are receiving has suffered. The necessity of appropriate funding is crucial so vote YES on Prop. 30.  

Bibliography

Freeman, Bill. "Prop. 30 Invests in Education, Economy." U-T San Diego. N.p., 23 Sept. 2012. Web. 23 Sept. 2012. <http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/sep/23/tp-prop-30-invests-in-education-economy/>. 

Hernandez, Kristen. "Majority of Californians Support Prop. 30, Poll Says." Daily Trojan. N.p., 27 Aug. 2012. Web. 9 Sept. 2012. <http://dailytrojan.com/2012/08/27/majority-of-californians-support-prop-30-poll-says/>.

"Yes on Proposition 30, No on Proposition 38." Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, 02 Oct. 2012. Web. 14 Oct. 2012. <http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/endorsements/la-ed-end-prop-30-prop38-20121002,0,2923644.story>.

Prop 30 final draft

Sam Imsland

English 2

Mrs. Knapp

14 October, 2012

Yes on Prop. 30, Save Our Future

California was once the highest ranked state in the country to receive an education. Our public schools offered a well rounded form of education; music and art classes, metal and wood shop, school field trips, on top of the best materials and teachers needed to prepare our students in the competitive job market. However, the state of California is in a deep budget deficit effecting the necessary funding needed to ensure the high quality of education our students once received. Together, kindergarden through 12th grade and higher education makes up half of California’s state budget. Gov. Jerry Brown has drawn up a proposal for a temporary increase in sales and income tax in-order to replenish funding for education. A vote in favor of Prop 30 will help get our education standards back on track and give our students the education they deserve. 

A recent poll showed that California voters would support Prop. 30 which would increase sales and income taxes to reduce budget cuts to public education. The sales tax would increase 1/4 cent per dollar for four years and the personal income tax for those who make more than $250,000 for seven years. “If it passes, the state will receive several billion dollars in additional revenue that will help prevent further cuts to education and other areas,” said Dominic Brewer, vice dean of research in partnerships and globalization at Rossier. If Prop. 30 passes, our state would receive about $6 billion in additional state revenue. If rejected, the state budget would be shortened by $6 billion. In the case of failure, state law calls for $4.8 billion in automatic "trigger cuts" to public schools, more than $1 billion in cuts to higher education budgets and $100 million in other reductions. On top of the trigger cuts, further cuts will still be needed if this measure does not pass.

Raising taxes has always been difficult for lawmakers, one reason the state is 35 billion in debt. Unable to create revenue, our state has solved its fiscal problems by spending less. As a result, students have less opportunities and teachers are losing their jobs. According to an article in the LA Times, critics against Prop. 30 say, “the states budget troubles stem from out-of-control spending, not a shortage of revenue”. They argue that by supporting Prop. 30, the generated tax funds will be spent on things unrelated to education. However, stated in the official title and summary of Proposition 30, new revenues would be deposited into a newly created state account called the Education Protection Account (EPA). Of the funds in the account, 89 percent would be provided to schools and 11 percent to community colleges. Schools and community colleges could use these funds for any educational purpose. The details of the proposition are very clear and you can be assured the money from Prop. 30 will go into our classrooms. 

Being a college student I have personally seen the effects a lack of funding has had on our educational system.  I have paid the higher tuition fees and have struggled to receive the classes I have asked for. According to Students for Quality Education (www.csusqe.org/chapters), Cabrillo, the community college I currently attend, student fees have increased by 85.5% in the last few years, from $26/unit in spring 2010 to $46/unit in fall 2012. In-order to keep it from becoming any worse, Prop. 30 must pass. However if Prop. 30 does not pass, Cabrillo will face an additional cut of 7.3% making it even harder for students to enroll and afford tuition costs. Not only students face the burden of reduced funding, but the teachers, staff, and administration face losing their jobs.  My older brothers were at the same college five years ago and they have noticed it has become much more difficult to get into classes. Also, my dad came to Cabrillo thirty years ago and he remembers it being easy to get the classes he signed up for as well as afford the tuition costs. 

The availability and opportunity to receive a higher education in California is declining. Our state is ranked 31st for people ages 25-34 with a college degree. The number of people becoming educated is less and less each year. The labor force will be in great need of skilled workers in the next ten years because of the high number of retirees. However, we will not have a big enough skilled workforce to fill those job positions. This will cause businesses to outsource their workers furthering the decline of California’s economy. The future of our state depends on the number of educated people we can produce. So with the future of our economy tied so closely to education, allowing students the opportunity to easily go to college is the ultimate goal. Bill Freeman says in the article, Prop 30 Invests in Education, Economy , that Prop. 30 “is the only measure that stops the cuts, avoids the steep tuition hikes, and invests in our schools and colleges starting this year so we can prepare the next generation for the jobs of the future”. A well funded education system is key for a strong economy in the future. 

As a result of the current budget deficit, programs such as art and music will see a major change or probable cut. Personally, music and art were my most meaningful and enjoyable classes. The ceramics class I took in high school made me excited to go to school everyday. It created an interest for me to come to school everyday and learn while other academic subjects failed to motivate me. Robert Daniels, supervisor for the Visual and Performing Arts Department of San Francisco Unified School District, United Administrators of San Francisco, AFSA Local  says, “Art allows them to find joy in learning. With access to arts, you have various avenues to make kids want to learn and to learn better. By eradicating art and music programs, districts are putting a roadblock in the way of the students whose passions and strengths are manifested through these outlets”. Hands on learning is becoming a lost method of training for my generation. What if our art and music classes turned into classes where the only thing you did was talk about art or talk about music? It would be like being taught how to surf on the beach and never going out into the water to ride a wave. Art and music programs are not cheap to run, but are worth every penny because of the positive influence they can have on our lives.  

The education we provide for our students determines how successful our state will be. A vote Yes on proposition 30 will ensure a high quality of education and will make receiving a higher form of education more accessible. As a result of the current budget cuts to our schools, the education our future generations are receiving has suffered. The necessity of appropriate funding is crucial so vote YES on Prop. 30.  

Bibliography

Freeman, Bill. "Prop. 30 Invests in Education, Economy." U-T San Diego. N.p., 23 Sept. 2012. Web. 23 Sept. 2012. <http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/sep/23/tp-prop-30-invests-in-education-economy/>. 

Hernandez, Kristen. "Majority of Californians Support Prop. 30, Poll Says." Daily Trojan. N.p., 27 Aug. 2012. Web. 9 Sept. 2012. <http://dailytrojan.com/2012/08/27/majority-of-californians-support-prop-30-poll-says/>.

"Yes on Proposition 30, No on Proposition 38." Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, 02 Oct. 2012. Web. 14 Oct. 2012. <http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/endorsements/la-ed-end-prop-30-prop38-20121002,0,2923644.story>.

rough draft Prop. 30

Yes on Prop. 30, Save Our Future

California was once the highest ranked place in the world to receive an education. Our public schools offered a well rounded form of education; music and art classes, metal and wood shop, school field trips, on top of the best materials and teachers needed to prepare our students in the competitive job market. However, the state of California is in a deep budget deficit effecting the appropriate amount of funding needed to ensure the high quality of education our students once received. Together, kindergarden through 12th grade and higher education makes up half of California’s state budget. Gov. Jerry Brown has drawn up a proposal for a temporary sales and income tax in-order to replenish education funding. A vote yes on Prop 30 will help get our education standards back on track and give our students the education they deserve. 

A recent poll showed that California voters would support Prop. 30 which would increase sales and income taxes to reduce budget cuts to public education. The sales tax would increase 1/4 cent per dollar for four years and the personal income tax for those who make more than $250,000 for seven years. “If it passes, the state will receive several billion dollars in additional revenue that will help prevent further cuts to education and other areas,” said Dominic Brewer, vice dean of research in partnerships and globalization at Rossier. If the prop passes our state would receive about $6 billion in additional state revenue. If rejected the state budget would be shortened by $6 billion. In the case of failure, state law calls for $4.8 billion in automatic "trigger cuts" to public schools, more than $1 billion in cuts to higher education budgets and $100 million in assorted other reductions. On top of the trigger cuts, further cuts will still be needed if this measure does not pass, but experts believe the poll results will prove true.    

Being a college student I have personally seen the effects of our educational system.  I have paid the higher tuition fees and have struggled to receive the classes I have asked for. At Cabrillo, the community college I currently attend, the student fees have increased by 85.5 % in the last few years, from $26/unit in spring 2010 to $46/unit in fall 2012. In-order to keep it from becoming any worse, Prop. 30 must pass. However if Prop. 30 does not pass, Cabrillo will face an additional cut of 7.3% making it even harder for students to enroll and afford tuition costs. Not only students face the burden of reduced funding, but the teachers, staff, and administration face losing their jobs.  My older brothers were at the same college five years ago and they have noticed it has become much more difficult to get through. Also, my dad came to Cabrillo thirty  years ago and he remembers being easily able to receive the classes he signed up for and easily able to afford tuition costs. 

The availability and opportunity to receive a higher education in California is declining. Our state is ranked 31st for people ages 25-34 with a college degree. The number of people becoming educated is less and less each year. The labor force will be in great need of skilled workers in the next ten years because of the high number of retirees. However, we will not have a big enough skilled workforce to fill those job positions. This will cause businesses to outsource their workers effecting the money staying inside the California economy. The future of our state depends on the number of educated people we can produce. So with the future of our economy tied so closely to education, allowing students the opportunity to easily go to college is the ultimate goal. Bill Freeman says in the article, Prop 30 Invests in Education, Economy , that Prop. 30 “is the only measure that stops the cuts, avoids the steep tuition hikes, and invests in our schools and colleges starting this year so we can prepare the next generation for the jobs of the future”. A well funded education system is key for a strong economy in the future. 

As a result of the current budget deficit, programs such as art and music will see a major change or probable cut. When I was in public school I can remember enjoying my music and art classes the most out of any other subject. The ceramics class I took in high school made me excited to go to school everyday. It created an interest in me to come to school everyday and learn while other academic subjects failed to motivate me. Robert Daniels, supervisor for the Visual and Performing Arts Department of San Francisco Unified School District, United Administrators of San Francisco, AFSA Local  says, “Art allows them to find joy in learning. With access to arts, you have various avenues to make kids want to learn and to learn better. By eradicating art and music programs, districts are putting a roadblock in the way of the students whose passions and strengths are manifested through these outlets”. Hands on learning is becoming a lost method of training for our younger generation. What if our art and music classes turned into art theory and music theory classes. Where the only thing you did in these classes was talk about making art or talk about making music. It would be like being taught how to surf on the beach and never going out into the water to ride a wave. Art and music programs are not cheap to run, but are worth every penny because of the great influence they can have on kids lives.  

The education we provide for our students determines how successful our state will be. A vote Yes on proposition 30 will ensure a high quality of education and will make receiving a higher form of education more accecible. As a result of the current budget cuts to our schools, the education our future generation is receiving has suffered. The necessity of appropriate funding is evident so vote yes on Prop. 30.  

proposal

Proposal 

Title

Author: Sam Imsland

Date: 9/31/2012

Topic: Yes on Proposition 30

Exigence: If the proposition does not pass, the educational system will continue to get worse, making it harder to reach the American dream.  

Purpose: To give voters an inside look at what proposition 30 could or could not do for the educational system.  

Claim: Vote Yes on proposition 30 for the well-being of people in the education system. A Yes vote will keep the quality of education high and make it more affordable for everyone.  

Writer’s Strategy 1:  The logical reasoning I will use in my Op-ED will be specific points about how the lack of educational funding has resulted in a worse form of education. I will include facts about increased tuition for students, cuts of staff and teachers, and increased class sizes. I will compare data of class sizes, tuition, and number of teachers and staff from the last few years to its current statistics. 

Reader Effect 1:  By incorporating factual evidence into my writing I hope the reader will become more aware of the struggling situation our educational system is in. Readers will see how much goes into a quality educational system which will help them realize the necessity of appropriate funding. 

Writer’s Strategy 2: Being a college student I have personally seen the effects of our educational system.  I personally have paid the higher tuition fees and have struggled to receive the classes I have asked for. My older brothers were at the same college five years ago and they have noticed it has become much more difficult to get through. Also, my dad came to Cabrillo 30 years ago and he remembers having no problems getting into classes.

Reader Effect 2: The reader will have a primary sourced account of how Cabrillo used to operate under appropriate funding. Showing the reader how much easier it was to go to school in the years past compared to now will help convince them to support proposition 30. By using ethos in my argument I am showing the reader how credible my stance is on this topic. 

Writer’s strategy 3: I will give a personal reflection of how much art classes and music classes helped me enjoy going to school. Because of these classes, it motivated me to try harder in my other classes. If the proposition does not pass, these classes will be the first to see a major change or probable cut. 

Reader Effect 3: By reflecting on a personal memory of mine a reader may remember a favorite class he or she had growing up and remember how much it had an influence on  the rest of their life. They will show sympathy for the younger generations to come because of the lose of educational standards unavailable today. 

annotated bib.

Hernandez, Kristen. "Majority of Californians Support Prop. 30, Poll Says." Daily Trojan. N.p., 27 Aug. 2012. Web. 9 Sept. 2012. <http://dailytrojan.com/2012/08/27/majority-of-californians-support-prop-30-poll-says/>.

The article I read was from the Daily Trojan and it was written by Kristen Hernandez. The article was titled, Majority of Californians support Prop. 30, poll says. A recent poll showed that California voters would support Prop. 30 which would increase sales and income taxes to reduce budget cuts to public education. The sales tax would increase 1/4 cent per dollar for four years and the personal income tax for those who make more than $250,000 for seven years. The poll was conducted by the Policy Analysis for California Education and Rossier School of Education. The intended audience for this article are educated adults who have an interest in school funding and tax measures. In comparison, the people interviewed in this article showed the same amount of concern about educational funding as the author Bill Freeman did in his article. 

Freeman, Bill. "Prop. 30 Invests in Education, Economy." U-T San Diego. N.p., 23 Sept. 2012. Web. 23 Sept. 2012. <http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/sep/23/tp-prop-30-invests-in-education-economy/>. 

The author Bill Freeman compares how the California public school system was once the best in the world to its struggling current situation. Freeman says, “Somewhere along the line, California stopped investing in education, and it has hurt us all”. Mr. Freeman points out that students are unprepared for college and work in the 21st century because of the overcrowded class sizes, the extinction of enrichment programs, and the many more basic classroom necessities that have been lost. Freeman knows Prop. 30 will not provide all the funding our schools need, but it will protect us from an additional $6 billion in midyear cuts. In one way or another Mr. Freeman has connected the welfare of everyone to the eventual approval or failure of Prop. 30. 

"Yes on Proposition 30, No on Proposition 38." Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, 02 Oct. 2012. Web. 14 Oct. 2012. <http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/endorsements/la-ed-end-prop-30-prop38-20121002,0,2923644.story>.

The article I read was an op-ed published in the LA Times. The author argued in-favor of prop. 30 and against prop. 38. The article used specific facts from the official title and summary of Proposition 30. As an example, "Of the funds in the account, 89 percent would be provided to schools and 11 percent to community colleges". By using specific text from the original proposition, it gives the author credibility. He also incorporated counter examples which showed he thought about both sides of the issue.  The author was very convincing with his argument about prop 30 because he used many examples of how education is important and necessary for our society.